Leuvens kankerinstituut
- Soorten kanker
- Onderzoeken
- Behandelingen
- Omgaan met kanker
- Preventie
- Steun een kankerfonds
- Over ons
- Situering en opdracht
- Organigram
- Onderzoek
- Prijzen
- Studies en onderzoeksprogramma's
- Abstracts
- Abdominale transplantchirurgie
- Algemene medische oncologie
- Centrum menselijke erfelijkheid
- Digestieve oncologie
- Dermatologie
- Endocrinologie
- Gynaecologie - verloskunde
- Hematologie
- Kindergeneeskunde
- Multidisciplinair borstcentrum
- Neurochirurgie
- Neus-, keel- en oorziekten
- Nucleaire geneeskunde
- Oogziekten
- Radiologie
- Radiotherapie
- Respiratoire oncologie
- Thoraxheelkunde
- Urologie
- Fysische geneeskunde en revalidatie
- Laboratoriumgeneeskunde
- Psychiatrie en psychologie
- Contact
Abstracts publicaties abdominale heelkunde
Perineal colostomy with antegrade continence enemas as an alternative after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Penninckx F, D’Hoore A, Vandenbosch A. Ann Chir 2005;130:327-330. Abstract: Some young and active patients requiring abdominoperineal resection for rectum cancer ask for an alternative of an abdominal colostomy. We analysed the results after a combination of a perineal colostomy and antegrade continence enemas (ACE). Fifteen patients have been operated between 1999 and 2004. Follow-up was >six months in 12 patients with a mean of two years and with a maximum of 55 months. The QLQ-C30 (version 3) and CR 38 questionnaires of the EORTC have been used to evaluate quality of life aspects. Five out of 15 patients presented complications: infection of the caecal conduit (2), small bowel obstruction (1), prolapse of the perineal colostomy (1), eventration (1), urologic complications (2). ACE are still used by all patients. The volume needed was 400 ml and duration of irrigation was 30 minutes (15-45 minutes). The median score for faecal incontinence was 0; faecal pseudocontinence was obtained by 7/12 patients. The scores for all aspects of functioning were excellent, as well as the score for body image. The general health status and quality of life were estimated at 75% from normal value. The procedure is simple and can be performed in one operative session. A perineal colostomy with ACE seems to be a valuable and less expensive alternative for an abdominal colostomy, and certainly for total anorectal reconstruction.
Cancer cell dissemination during curative surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Topal B Aerts JL, Roskams T, Fieuws S, Van Pelt J, Vandekerckhove P, Penninckx F. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:506-511. Abstract: AIM: The amount of cancer cells disseminated during curative surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may be responsible for recurrence. Haematogenous and intrahepatic cancer cell dissemination was evaluated, and its impact on cancer recurrence was assessed. METHOD: Twenty patients with resectable CRLM were included in a prospective study. Twelve patients underwent curative resection for 21 metastases. Ten selected metastases in eight patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) followed by resection at the same operative session. Cancer cell dissemination was determined before, during and after surgery using 'real time' quantitative RT-PCR assay, based on detection and quantification of CEA and CK20 mRNA transcripts. RESULTS: Circulating cancer cells were detected in 80% and intrahepatic cancer cells in 37% of the patients, though without impact on cancer recurrence. The amounts of disseminated cancer cells were significantly increased after surgery. This increase was similar in patients treated with and without RFA. RFA caused complete tumour destruction. CONCLUSION: Curative surgery for CRLM significantly increases the amount of disseminated cancer cells. Radiofrequency ablation can completely destroy selected resectable CRLM without excessive cancer cell dissemination. Neither haematogenous nor intrahepatic cancer cell dissemination were related to cancer recurrence in this small patient series
Aggregated colon cancer cells have a higher metastatic efficiency in the liver compared with non aggregated cells: an experimental study. Topal B, Roskams T, Fevery J, Penninckx F. J Surg Res 2003;112: 31-37. Abstract: BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether aggregated colon cancer cells have a higher tendency for metastasis formation than nonaggregated cells. Also, the absolute number of cancer cells required for hepatic metastasis remains undefined. The aim of the present study was to compare in the liver the metastatic efficiency of viable nonaggregated colon cancer cells versus cell aggregates for equivalent numbers of cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DHD/K12/TRb colon cancer cells were administered through the portal vein in syngeneic male BD IX rats. Surgical exploration was performed 8 weeks after injection. Four groups of rats were injected with 0.25 or 0.5 x 10(6) DHD/K12/TRb viable cancer cells, either as single nonaggregated cells or as cell aggregates. RESULTS: Hepatic metastases were observed in 81% of the rats after intraportal injection of cell aggregates equivalent to 0.5 x 10(6) cancer cells. A significant lower metastatic efficiency was found after the injection of 0.5 x 10(6) non-aggregated, and 0.25 x 10(6) aggregated or nonaggregated cancer cells i.e., 16%, 32%, and 27%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aggregated colon cancer cells have a higher metastatic efficiency in the liver compared with non-aggregated cells, although a critical number of cancer cells are necessary.
Patterns of failure following curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. Topal B, Kaufman L, Aerts R, Penninckx F.Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:248-253. Abstract: AIMS: Several studies have focused on factors determining recurrence and survival rate after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (LM). Data are lacking with regard to patterns of failure indicating where and when recurrences arise. METHODS: One-hundred-and-five consecutive patients [F/M: 31/74; mean age 61 years (range 36-80 y)] with primary colorectal liver metastases underwent surgical R0 curative resection between 1990-1999. Patient follow-up was closed in January 2002. The common closing date method was used for survival analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox proportional hazard technique. RESULTS: The overall (OS) vs disease free survival (DFS) rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 88.5 vs 63.3, 73.4 vs 40.2, and 36.8 vs 18.1%, respectively. Elevated serum CEA level was the only factor independently related to recurrent disease. Elevated serum CEA level, maximum diameter of liver metastases (LM), and satellitosis were factors significantly related to poor OS. Recurrent liver metastases developed in 43% and extra-hepatic metastases in 60% of the patients. In about half of the patients cancer recurrence was observed within 18 months, almost equally distributed between hepatic and extra-hepatic sites. CONCLUSION: Despite optimal patient selection and curative resection of colorectal liver metastases, more than a half of the patients developed cancer recurrence within 2 years.
Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of unresectable liver malignancies: feasibility and clinical outcome. Topal B, Aerts R, Penninckx F. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13: 11-15. Abstract: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective treatment in patients with unresectable liver malignancies. Since there is little information on its optimal approach, the feasibility, clinical outcome, and efficacy of laparoscopic RFA need further investigation. Twenty-three consecutive patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies were treated with RFA. RFA was performed percutaneously in 5 patients (5 tumors; median maximum diameter of 25 mm [range, 20-73]), via laparotomy in 9 (28 tumors; median maximum diameter of 38 mm [5-90]), and via laparoscopy in 9 (16 tumors; median maximum diameter of 35 mm [8-58]). Mortality and intraoperative complication rates were 0. In the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups, mean blood loss was 13 mL versus 421 mL and mean hospital stay was 5.7 versus 11.2 days, respectively (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.04). Postoperative complications occurred in one patient after laparoscopic RFA and in three after RFA via laparotomy. After a median follow-up of 12.2 months, local recurrence occurred in 2 patients (laparoscopic RFA, 1; percutaneous RFA, 1), and new hepatic tumors developed in 7 (laparoscopic RFA, 2/9; RFA via laparotomy, 5/9). Laparoscopic RFA is a safe and feasible treatment modality to achieve tumor destruction in selected patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies.
